Let's talk realignment
Any third-grader with a calculator in hand can tell you there's something out of whack with Major League Baseball's alignment.
Six teams in one division and four in another just doesn't compute in any manner that can be explained. Mathematically, National League Central teams have a 16.7 percent shot at winning their division, while the four-pack in the American League West has a 25 percent chance.
In the category of Serious Measures for Serious Times, here is a sensible, logical way to fix the problem and improve the sport.
Take the Houston Astros and the San Diego Padres, and move them to the AL West.
Shift the Seattle Mariners to the NL West.
Voila! Balance is achieved, and the travel budget makes infinitely more sense.
With these changes, we would have 15 AL teams, 15 NL teams. Six divisions, each housing five teams. This effectively eliminates the imbalance and unfairness generated by a six-team NL Central and a four-team AL West.
Yes, the schedule must be adjusted. No problem. One Interleague series is staged at all times. Call it the Spotlight Series.
The Astros give the Rangers a full-time rival. When AL West teams travel to Texas three times a year, they hit both cities. No more Dallas to Seattle junkets for travel-weary AL West clubs.
The same general dynamic, more loosely applied, links the Mariners and the Rockies in the new NL West.
Finding an Interleague rival for Seattle remains a problem, but San Diego never really worked anyway.
The Padres adopt the Angels as their new division rivals, replacing the Dodgers. That was always fairly one-sided anyway. The Dodgers never have gotten too worked up about San Diego. Their heart was always in San Francisco, a connection to one the most intense rivalries in sports history when the clubs were hostile New York neighbors.
While the NL West retains its one traditional, unbreakable rivalry, the Diamondbacks emerge as the Padres' Interleague goes. That makes a lot more sense than Padres-Mariners ever did.
Flaws are sure to be found with this idea. No plan is foolproof. But it seems clear that the benefits and advantages significantly outweigh any negatives.
Balance is everything in life. The smartest man I ever met - John Wooden - always pointed that out. There is no balance in 16 teams in one league, 14 in another. There is no balance - or fairness -- in one division housing six teams, another four.
Balance is two leagues with 15 teams each, six divisions with five teams apiece.
If an owner or two has to make a sacrifice by identifying with a new league, so be it. It's for the greater good. In difficult times, that's how we're supposed to be thinking, right?
I like it! But you know - the powers-to-be will never accept it - it actually makes sense! lol!
Julia
http://werbiefitz.mlblogs.com/
Report any abuse or spam
Since I don't like any NL teams and do like the Mariners (2nd to the Angels), why not just move Milwaukee back to the AL and put them in the Central Div, and put KC in the West. KC and the Angels could renew the rivalry they had going in the 80's when it seemed like they battled every year for the division title which KC usually won.
Report any abuse or spam
I totally agree, but I don't really get why messing with San diego and Seattle, I think the league would be more willing to move just one team, just move Houston to the NL West. But like Julia said they will never go for it because it makes sense.
Report any abuse or spam
Why move two or three teams when moving just one will do?
Move houston into the AL West.
Done.
Do it now while Bergman and Lee are aging so that the Houston people will be more likely to want the DH.
Report any abuse or spam
I agree on realignment, but there's no reason to move Seattle or San Diego. Either move Houston to the AL West, or move them to the NL West and shift another team (Arizona makes the most sense) to the AL West. With Interleague apparently here to stay, the Astros and Rangers can play each other every year anyway, so it's not imperative they change leagues. Arizona has been in the NL the shortest period of time, so they have the least stake in staying and maintaining league and division rivalries. Any problems with scheduling two 15-team leagues can be balanced by using Interleaugue games. Anything would be better than the unbalanced mess of a schedule teams play now. And while we're at it, let's agree on (1) no more season openers in Tokyo (or Timbuktu), and (2) no more regular season baseball in March.
Report any abuse or spam
I think you need to add a 2 teams to make it 32 teams. Add 2 playoff spots so there is 12 of 32 who can make the playoffs and instead of restrict a players earnings realign teams based on payroll spent. example:
Yanks, Red Soxs, Mets, Phils in one division and Teams like the Pirates, Nationals, Indians, Reds in another. This would ensure teams with lower payrolls can be represented in the playoffs. As you spend more you change divisions. This would keep the schedule fresh and teams like the Pirates and Royals would have a chance to play in October.
check out the plan at:
http://thefairball.com/mlb-realignment-plan/
Report any abuse or spam